Repeated integration work
Define which connections and components can be reused across the intended features.
Build AI into a product flow your users can complete and your team can operate. ACW develops the interface, model connection, context handling, and application logic for the feature you need to release.
Contact UsDefine which connections and components can be reused across the intended features.
Specify what users can edit, approve, retry, or complete without AI.
Assess context size, response time, and request volume alongside output quality.
A user flow and architecture for the selected feature.
Implemented interface and system connections within scope.
Context, access, and output-handling rules.
Evaluation examples, findings, and known limitations.
Release and handover documentation for the included environment.
Agree the user’s task, acceptable output, and behaviour when AI is unavailable.
Review model options against representative inputs, latency, cost, and data requirements. Identify reusable components without assuming every future feature needs the same architecture.
Connect the interface, backend, and model. Add the validation and review steps the task requires.
Test ordinary requests, missing data, unsuitable outputs, and provider failures. Record what is ready and what remains outside the release.
Define quality examples, response-time expectations, request limits, and a cost measure such as cost per completed task. Check whether users can recover from failure and whether an unauthorised request can reach restricted data or actions. Version changes need a repeatable way to check these behaviours again.
This example describes a possible scope, not an ACW client result.
A user submits an authorised document and receives a structured draft summary. The interface shows the source passages used and lets the user edit the draft. Unsupported sections are flagged for review. The saved result remains a deliberate user action, with retention defined for the document and its generated output.
That depends on existing interfaces, APIs, and access controls. Assess those constraints before deciding whether to extend or replace a component.
No. This service concerns the product around AI. Model training is a separate requirement when the task justifies it.
The architecture can account for that requirement. Switching still needs evaluation because output, capabilities, and costs differ.
Share the task, expected output, existing product, and constraints on data or operating cost.