Ongoing development
A dedicated team for continuing product work where maintaining context matters.
Loading the pageLoading the pageLoading the pageAdd engineering capacity or hand over a defined scope. ACW helps you choose how a team joins the work: a dedicated team, specialists inside your own team, a project with agreed outputs, or one team across the product cycle.
Discuss your team requirementsExplore delivery modelsMatch the engagement to the work, the responsibilities your team keeps, and the decisions that need an owner.
Whichever model fits, the engagement starts by agreeing the work, the roles, and how results are reviewed.
Roles, availability, and the division of responsibility are agreed before delivery starts.
Requirements, dependencies, and acceptance criteria are recorded, so completion is not open to interpretation.
Research findings, design choices, and technical constraints stay available as work moves between disciplines.
Changes in scope are recorded with their effect on effort and delivery dependencies before the plan moves.
Start with the backlog or scope, the skills it requires, and the responsibilities your team keeps.
Compare a dedicated team, extended roles, a project scope, or an end-to-end team against that work.
Define roles, availability, access, onboarding, and how work is reviewed and accepted.
Check progress against the agreed outputs, and adjust the team or scope through recorded decisions.
Start with the work. Continuing product development suits a dedicated team, a specific skill gap suits team extension, a defined result suits a project, and a product that needs every discipline suits an end-to-end team.
It depends on the roles, availability, access, and onboarding involved. The start date is agreed during scoping rather than assumed.
That is agreed before delivery starts. With team extension, your team keeps management; with a dedicated or project team, the engagement defines the division of product and delivery responsibility.
