Wallet friction
A user needs to understand which account is connected and whether the next action requests a signature or submits a transaction.
Build the application around what a user needs to accomplish. Connect wallet interactions, contract calls, transaction status, and supporting services into an agreed product flow.
Review the user flowContact UsA user needs to understand which account is connected and whether the next action requests a signature or submits a transaction.
Submission, inclusion, and finality are distinct events on networks such as Ethereum. A transaction hash alone is not evidence that an action is complete. Ethereum transaction documentation.
The interface and backend need an agreed approach to reading chain state and displaying records that are still being reconciled.
The delivery can include interaction designs, implemented application flows, wallet and contract connections, status handling, and scenario-based test evidence. Release documentation records supported networks, wallets, and known limitations.
Acceptance follows the agreed user journey, including declined signatures, unsuccessful transactions, and unavailable dependencies where those scenarios are in scope.
Start by mapping the user’s task and the actions it requires. Review wallet and contract dependencies, build the agreed flow, and test state changes in the specified environments.
The release review checks the supported combinations, unresolved issues, and operating responsibilities. The plan defines what is monitored and who responds when the transaction and application states need investigation.
Agree browser, wallet, network, contract, and backend coverage. Custody arrangements, private-key handling, contract changes, and ongoing support are separate responsibilities that need explicit agreement.
Illustrative example
An application lets an eligible user claim a digital item. The journey would check the account and network, explain the action, request the required approval, and show the resulting status. If the user declines or the action fails, the interface would explain the available next step.
Support depends on the chosen integration and tested environments. The scope lists the wallets and connection methods included.
Timing depends on the selected network and transaction conditions. The application should display status and handling options rather than promise a universal completion time.
That depends on the agreed architecture. Key custody and authorization must be specified; a wallet connection does not by itself establish the custody model.
Share the intended actions, existing contracts, and supported environments.